methodology

Pure Functions: The Missing Discipline in Agentic AI

· 5 min read · 3 min video

The Problem With AI Agent Pipelines

Most agentic AI systems today are built the same way: chain a bunch of LLM calls together, pass mutable state between them, cross your fingers, and deploy. When something breaks — and it will — nobody can tell you which step failed or why.

This is the equivalent of writing a 2,000-line function with no tests and saying “it works on my machine.”

What Pure Functions Give You

A pure function has no side effects and returns the same output for the same input. When you build an AI agent pipeline as a chain of pure functions, something powerful happens:

The Proof: 406 Tests on a Production AI System

Our bid automation system processes construction RFI emails through a pure function pipeline: raw email in, classified and extracted data out. When we upgraded from Claude 3 to Claude 3.5 Sonnet, the regression suite caught 3 classification edge cases that would have silently degraded accuracy in production.

That’s not theoretical. That’s 406 tests running in under 3 minutes, catching real regressions on a real production system.

The Discipline

Building AI agents with pure functions isn’t harder — it’s more disciplined. And discipline is the difference between a demo and a system that runs on Monday morning.

The pattern is simple:

  1. Define the interface. What goes in, what comes out.
  2. Write the test first. What does correct behavior look like?
  3. Implement the minimal function. Make the test pass.
  4. Chain the functions. Compose them into a pipeline.
  5. Regression test the chain. Catch drift before users do.

This is computer science, not prompt engineering. And it’s the future of building AI agents that survive production.

Cedric Williams

Founder, ced.ai

Let's talk about your project.

We build AI systems with the same engineering discipline we write about.

Start a Conversation